« The Student Hurricane Network (SHN) | Main | Welcome to the World Annabelle! »

4 Pilings of the Nola House.

I had the opportunity last night to attend a special dinner at a friend's home with 16 others. Those in attendance are very involved and crucial to the civic and political institutions of the city. They sit on boards and make decisions that affect our lives. I was definitely the odd ball of the group as I am mainly involved with media and creative endeavors. I am on no boards.

This conversation was the 3rd in a series whose attendance had grown from 4 to 8 to 16.  The conversation was 2 hours or so long. We examined the current state of the city and region and looked seriously at how a city with so many broken and mismanaged institutions before Katrina can possibly address the mountain of responsibility with little help from government or outside forces. Namely, how do the people and civic institutions address the 4 main areas of importance: Education, Economics, Safety and Participation. In other cities the instruments and organizations exist to keep the government in check and responsive to the needs of the people. Their systems are self correcting and run reasonably well. But if all the systems in your city are broken or don't operate as they are intended before a catastrophe, how do you then "fix" things afterward? Do you start over from scratch or re-examine how to fix the mechanisms for running your city? What can one citizen do to help create this needed change?

I believe it is clear to all of us that those outside New Orleans and the surrounding region believe that we are a lost cause. There is little faith that we will succeed in bringing New Orleans back.  And I must agree with their appraisal if we don't address these 4 main areas of concern all at once and now. After speaking with my friend Jonah I wanted to update this last line as it is a bit doom and gloom. There are many projects, programs and initiatives that are addressing these 4 main areas very well and in refreshing new ways. I hope to spotlight some of these with my work with NPN on their new site we will launch in May.

I was left with some questions of my own after the dinner. Here they are from my notes. Maybe you have some ideas or insight with a few of these:

Participation:

How do you get people more involved when they don't trust their governing bodies?

How to get citizens to participate when they don't understand the very processes, rights and institutions they should participate within?

How can you get parents to understand the value of and therefore become involved within primary education for newborns and after-school and summer programs for children?

How can we shine a spotlight and highlight the examples of citizen participation that is successful in invoking change?

How do we examine, define and change the roadblocks to participation?

Education:

How can we begin as early as possible with children to save them from the inevitable (because no other way was ever taught or present as an example) future their parents and siblings had to endure?

How do we connect with teens and tweens who are already living without hope or positive guidance so they can begin to imagine a present of more possibility?

How do we keep older siblings from becoming the role models that younger children do not need?

What skills can be taught that can lead to creative endeavors rather than destructive?

Economy:

How and what skills can be taught with donated labor or funds?

What skills lead to a life of independence and personal reward versus dependency on another individual's venture and thus greater gain?

How can we explain the processes and responsibilities necessary to become an entrepreneur and small business owner?

How do you inspire someone who can't imagine a present or future where they have access to real possibilities for growth both financially and personally?

Safety:

How can we structure after-school and summer programs so they involve not just children but entire families and communities?

How can we re-define speaking out against crime as a benefit to your community rather than an undesirable risk or liability?

How can we link neighborhood to neighborhood and block to block so the problems of one area are the problems of another?

What alternatives exist that can be improved upon or enhanced that will address a need for alternatives to locking up youth and beginning the inevitable cycle of incarceration?

March 21, 2008 in Nola Stuff | Permalink

Comments

Token "participation" processes deserve the lion's share of blame for cynicism about public involvement. Take the RSD planning, for instance - meeting attendees have the great opportunity to "choose" one scenario out of ... one?!? Sounds like the decisions were already made in private (over dinner perhaps?) by the leaders and board members of our broken civic and political institutions, once again. Public, Thy Will Be Done, and anyone who objects to the latest in a series of false dilemmas will be a loud, obnoxious Enemy of Progress.

Do your friends really want participation, or applause and fawning gratitude for their tireless efforts to tell the rest of us what's good for us?

Posted by: Arid Becky | Mar 21, 2008 7:15:38 PM

Arid:

What are "token participation processes?"

And if these "participation processes" are a smoke screen then what is a better designed process to guarantee true participation?

//

When I talk about participation I don't just mean a UNOP process or the RSD, I am refering to any means to volunteer time, energy and ideas in bettering our economy, education system and crime/safety problem.

There does exist in the city an entitlement mindset. But that will never fly in Post-K New Orleans. Either we all participate and collaborate or we lose.

If you don't participate you can't bitch about the Mayor or City Council or Housing or Health care or Crime.

But if people don't know how to get involved or don't see the use in getting involved how do you reach them?

That is my concern. If the city has shit on you and your family for decades why should you believe the future can or will be any different?

Posted by: humidhaney | Mar 22, 2008 12:20:12 PM

A perfect example of "token participation processes" was what happened surrounding the housing issue. Our public "officials" held town hall meetings with residents of public housing who pleaded with them not to demolish and to promise a one-to-one rebuild if they decided to vote for demolition. And then every member of city council voted for demolition, reverted to old stereotypes of public housing residents, lied about the demolition and rebuild being more cost effective than renovation, and utilized the NOPD to threaten public housing residents away from protesting their self-serving decisions. All the while, the city's thuggish authorities hid behind a rhetoric of cooperation and participation.

You should get Maureen in on this discussion - she wrote her dissertation on urban planning and civic participation.

Posted by: Cynthia | Mar 23, 2008 6:48:09 PM

Post a comment